Feb 17, 2026

Arbitration vs Litigation for Texas Businesses

⚠️ EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION ONLY - NOT LEGAL ADVICE

This article provides general educational information comparing arbitration and litigation and is not legal advice. Laws and procedures are subject to change. This content is intended for general educational purposes and is not tailored to any individual business or legal dispute. Choosing between arbitration and litigation involves complex strategic considerations. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.

Get Updates on New Texas Business Guides

Businesses facing disputes often must evaluate whether to resolve them through arbitration or traditional court litigation. Each approach has different characteristics regarding costs, timelines, procedures, and strategic implications. Understanding these differences helps businesses make informed decisions about dispute resolution.

Comprehensive Comparison

Comprehensive Comparison

Factor Arbitration Litigation
Decision-Maker Arbitrator(s) selected by parties or organization Judge (appointed) or jury (selected during voir dire)
Formality Semi-formal procedures, more flexible Formal procedures, strict rules of evidence and procedure
Public Access Private proceedings (not open to public) Public proceedings (open courtroom, public record)
Confidentiality If provided by agreement or rules Public record (except sealed proceedings)
Discovery Limited discovery typically permitted Full discovery (depositions, interrogatories, requests)
Timeline Variable; may be faster or slower than litigation Often lengthy; court congestion affects schedule
Appeal Rights Very limited grounds for appeal Full appellate review available
Finality Award is final and binding (very limited review) Judgment subject to appellate review
Jury Trial No jury (arbitrator decides) Jury trial available in most civil cases
Rules of Evidence Relaxed; arbitrator has discretion Strict Texas Rules of Evidence apply

Cost Considerations

Arbitration Costs

Direct arbitration costs:

  • Arbitrator fees: Typically $200-$500+ per hour, shared by parties
  • Administrative fees: Filing and case management fees charged by arbitration organizations
  • Hearing facilities: Cost of hearing rooms if not provided by organization
  • Court reporter: If transcript desired

Attorney fees:

  • Legal representation costs similar to litigation
  • May be lower if discovery limited
  • Depends on case complexity and arbitration procedures

Other costs:

  • Expert witness fees
  • Document production and review
  • Travel costs if arbitration location distant
Cost Reality: Arbitration may be faster or less expensive in some cases. However, complex arbitrations can approach or exceed litigation costs, particularly when substantial arbitrator fees, extensive discovery, and lengthy hearings are involved.

Litigation Costs

Court filing costs:

  • Filing fees (vary by court and case type)
  • Service of process fees
  • Jury fees if jury trial
  • Generally lower than arbitration administrative fees

Attorney fees:

  • Discovery costs (depositions, document production)
  • Motion practice and hearings
  • Trial preparation
  • Trial time
  • Appeals if pursued

Other litigation expenses:

  • Expert witness fees
  • Court reporters for depositions
  • Document review and production
  • Demonstrative exhibits and trial materials

Timeline Comparison

Arbitration Timeline

Typical arbitration timeline:

  • Arbitrator selection: 1-3 months
  • Discovery period: 3-9 months (if permitted)
  • Hearing scheduling: Based on arbitrator and party availability
  • Hearing: Days to weeks depending on complexity
  • Award: 30-90 days after hearing typically
  • Total: Often 6-18 months from filing to award

Factors affecting timeline:

  • Arbitrator availability
  • Complexity of case
  • Amount of discovery permitted
  • Scheduling conflicts
  • Number of hearing days needed

Litigation Timeline

Typical litigation timeline in Texas:

  • Pleadings and initial motions: 2-6 months
  • Discovery: 6-18 months
  • Motion practice: Ongoing throughout
  • Trial setting: May wait months for available trial date
  • Trial: Days to weeks
  • Total to judgment: Often 18-36 months
  • Appeals if pursued: Additional 12-24+ months

Factors affecting timeline:

  • Court docket congestion
  • Complexity and discovery needs
  • Motion practice and delays
  • Settlement discussions
  • Appeals

Appeal Rights and Finality

Arbitration: Very Limited Appeal Rights

Critical Difference: Arbitration awards have extremely limited grounds for challenge. Even clear legal errors by the arbitrator generally do not justify vacatur. This finality is a fundamental characteristic of arbitration that parties should understand before agreeing to arbitrate.

Narrow grounds for vacating awards:

  • Corruption, fraud, or undue means
  • Evident partiality or corruption by arbitrator
  • Arbitrator misconduct
  • Arbitrator exceeding powers

What courts will NOT review:

  • Arbitrator's factual findings
  • Arbitrator's legal conclusions
  • Sufficiency of evidence
  • Whether court would have decided differently
  • Alleged errors of law or fact

Litigation: Full Appellate Review

Appellate rights:

  • Can appeal to Court of Appeals
  • Further appeal to Texas Supreme Court (discretionary)
  • Review of legal errors
  • Review of some factual determinations
  • Opportunity to correct trial court errors

Appellate process:

  • Notice of appeal filed after judgment
  • Appellate briefs submitted
  • Oral argument may occur
  • Appellate court issues opinion
  • Can affirm, reverse, or remand

Discovery Differences

Arbitration Discovery

Typical limitations:

  • Limited number of depositions
  • Restricted document requests
  • Abbreviated discovery period
  • Arbitrator discretion on scope

Implications:

  • Lower discovery costs
  • Faster to hearing
  • May limit ability to develop case fully
  • Less opportunity to discover adverse information

Litigation Discovery

Full discovery available:

  • Depositions of parties and witnesses
  • Interrogatories
  • Requests for production
  • Requests for admission
  • Subpoenas to third parties

Implications:

  • Thorough case development
  • Opportunity to obtain all relevant evidence
  • Higher costs and longer timeline
  • More leverage in settlement negotiations

Privacy and Confidentiality

Arbitration

Privacy:

  • Hearings not open to public
  • Proceedings conducted privately
  • No public attendance at hearing

Confidentiality:

  • Not automatic - must be provided by agreement or rules
  • Parties can agree to confidentiality provisions
  • Some arbitration rules include confidentiality
  • Court filings related to arbitration are public

Litigation

Public nature:

  • Court proceedings open to public
  • Court filings are public record
  • Trial testimony and evidence public
  • Judgments publicly available

Limited confidentiality options:

  • Protective orders for sensitive documents
  • Sealed proceedings (rare, requires showing)
  • Settlement agreements can include confidentiality

Strategic Considerations

Factors Often Considered When Arbitration Is Chosen

  • Confidentiality needs: Desire to keep dispute private
  • Specialized expertise: Ability to select arbitrator with industry knowledge
  • Finality preference: Desire to avoid appeals and achieve final resolution
  • International disputes: Arbitration awards more easily enforced internationally
  • Jury avoidance: Preference for professional decision-maker over jury
  • Contractual requirement: Arbitration clause in contract

Factors Often Considered When Litigation Is Chosen

  • Appeal rights valued: Desire for appellate review of legal errors
  • Discovery needs: Extensive discovery necessary to prove case
  • Jury trial desired: Preference for jury decision
  • Public record: Want public accountability or precedent
  • Injunctive relief needed: Immediate court orders required
  • No arbitration agreement: No contract requiring arbitration
  • Complex legal issues: Benefit from appellate review
No Universal Answer: The appropriate dispute resolution method depends on the specific circumstances of each dispute including the amount at stake, case complexity, discovery needs, timeline priorities, confidentiality concerns, and strategic considerations. Many businesses benefit from consulting with attorneys to evaluate which forum serves their interests in particular disputes.

⚠️ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

This article provides general educational information comparing arbitration and litigation and is not legal advice. Laws, procedures, costs, and strategic considerations are subject to change and vary significantly based on specific circumstances. The information provided may not reflect current practices or be applicable to your specific dispute.

Choosing between arbitration and litigation involves complex strategic, legal, and financial considerations unique to each case and business. Factors including discovery needs, appeal rights, costs, timeline, and case-specific circumstances require evaluation based on individual facts. Many businesses benefit from consulting with qualified Texas attorneys for guidance on dispute resolution strategy, forum selection, and protection of legal rights. Always consult with experienced litigation counsel for guidance specific to your business dispute and strategic needs.

Texas Business Mediation Process and Settlement Outcomes